2026 Subaru Forester vs 2024 Volvo C40
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 35 MPG vs 107 MPG combined — Volvo C40 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1950 vs $700 — Volvo C40 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2026 Subaru Forester | 2024 Volvo C40 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S6) | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | — |
| City MPG | 35 | 118 |
| Highway MPG | 34 | 96 |
| Combined MPG | 35 | 107 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1950 | $700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 255.0 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 4/5 | — |
🚗 2026 Subaru Forester
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Subaru Forester Profile →🚗 2024 Volvo C40
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 107 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volvo C40 Profile →🔗 Related