2026 Subaru Outback vs 2026 Mazda CX-50
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 27 MPG vs 38 MPG combined — Mazda CX-50 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $1800 — Mazda CX-50 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Subaru Outback | 2026 Mazda CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Class | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive | 4-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S8) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 25 | 39 |
| Highway MPG | 31 | 37 |
| Combined MPG | 27 | 38 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $1800 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 330.0 | 233.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Overall Safety | — | 5/5 ★ |
| Frontal Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Side Crash | — | 5/5 |
| Rollover | — | 4/5 |
🚗 2026 Subaru Outback
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 27 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Subaru Outback Profile →🚗 2026 Mazda CX-50
Small Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 38 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. 4-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda CX-50 Profile →🔗 Related