2011 Suzuki Swift vs 2011 BMW Active E
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 29 MPG vs 102 MPG combined — BMW Active E is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2050 vs $750 — BMW Active E saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2011 Suzuki Swift | 2011 BMW Active E |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2011 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Manual 5-spd | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 1.6 | — |
| City MPG | 27 | 107 |
| Highway MPG | 34 | 96 |
| Combined MPG | 29 | 102 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2050 | $750 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 306.44827586206895 | — |
🚗 2011 Suzuki Swift
Subcompact Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki Swift Profile →🚗 2011 BMW Active E
Subcompact Cars with 102 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BMW Active E Profile →🔗 Related