2013 Suzuki SX4 vs 2021 Mazda 2
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 28 MPG vs 35 MPG combined — Mazda 2 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2150 vs $1700 — Mazda 2 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2013 Suzuki SX4 | 2021 Mazda 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2013 | 2021 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (variable gear ratios) | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| City MPG | 25 | 32 |
| Highway MPG | 31 | 40 |
| Combined MPG | 28 | 35 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2150 | $1700 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 321.0 | 253.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 7/10 | 7/10 |
🚗 2013 Suzuki SX4
Compact Cars with 28 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki SX4 Profile →🚗 2021 Mazda 2
Compact Cars with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 2 Profile →🔗 Related