2004 Suzuki Vitara vs 2026 Ford Explorer
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 18 MPG vs 24 MPG combined — Ford Explorer is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $3300 vs $2800 — Ford Explorer saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2004 Suzuki Vitara | 2026 Ford Explorer |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2004 | 2026 |
| Class | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic 4-spd | Automatic 10-spd |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.3 |
| City MPG | 17 | 20 |
| Highway MPG | 20 | 29 |
| Combined MPG | 18 | 24 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $3300 | $2800 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 493.72222222222223 | 377.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 5/10 |
🚗 2004 Suzuki Vitara
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Suzuki Vitara Profile →🚗 2026 Ford Explorer
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 2WD with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Explorer Profile →🔗 Related