2026 Toyota Highlander vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 35 MPG vs 18 MPG combined — Toyota Highlander is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $1950 vs $3300 — Toyota Highlander saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2026 Toyota Highlander | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2026 | 2004 |
| Class | Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD | Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | All-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AV-S6) | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 35 | 17 |
| Highway MPG | 34 | 20 |
| Combined MPG | 35 | 18 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $1950 | $3300 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 253.0 | 493.72222222222223 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
| Overall Safety | 5/5 ★ | — |
| Frontal Crash | 4/5 | — |
| Side Crash | 5/5 | — |
| Rollover | 4/5 | — |
🚗 2026 Toyota Highlander
Standard Sport Utility Vehicle 4WD with 35 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Toyota Highlander Profile →🚗 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
Sport Utility Vehicle - 2WD with 18 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Chevrolet Tracker Profile →