2016 Volkswagen Eos vs 2026 Audi S3
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 25 MPG vs 26 MPG combined — Audi S3 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2750 vs $3150 — Volkswagen Eos saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Premium Gasoline vs Premium Gasoline
| Specification | 2016 Volkswagen Eos | 2026 Audi S3 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2016 | 2026 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline | Premium Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | All-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AM-S6) | Automatic (AM-S7) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 22 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 31 |
| Combined MPG | 25 | 26 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2750 | $3150 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 354.0 | 346.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | 5/10 |
🚗 2016 Volkswagen Eos
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volkswagen Eos Profile →🚗 2026 Audi S3
Subcompact Cars with 26 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. All-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Audi S3 Profile →