2016 Volkswagen Eos vs 2011 BMW Active E
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 25 MPG vs 102 MPG combined — BMW Active E is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2750 vs $750 — BMW Active E saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Premium Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2016 Volkswagen Eos | 2011 BMW Active E |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2016 | 2011 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Premium Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (AM-S6) | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 4 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | — |
| City MPG | 22 | 107 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 96 |
| Combined MPG | 25 | 102 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2750 | $750 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 354.0 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | —/10 |
🚗 2016 Volkswagen Eos
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Premium Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volkswagen Eos Profile →🚗 2011 BMW Active E
Subcompact Cars with 102 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BMW Active E Profile →