2013 Volvo C30 vs 2017 Lexus CT
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 42 MPG combined — Lexus CT is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $1400 — Lexus CT saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2013 Volvo C30 | 2017 Lexus CT |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2013 | 2017 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S5) | Automatic (variable gear ratios) |
| Cylinders | 5 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| City MPG | 21 | 43 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 40 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 42 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $1400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 362.0 | 212.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 6/10 | 9/10 |
🚗 2013 Volvo C30
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volvo C30 Profile →🚗 2017 Lexus CT
Compact Cars with 42 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Lexus CT Profile →🔗 Related