2013 Volvo C70 vs 2011 BMW Active E
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 22 MPG vs 102 MPG combined — BMW Active E is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2700 vs $750 — BMW Active E saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Electricity
| Specification | 2013 Volvo C70 | 2011 BMW Active E |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2013 | 2011 |
| Class | Subcompact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Electricity |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Rear-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S5) | Automatic (A1) |
| Cylinders | 5 | — |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | — |
| City MPG | 19 | 107 |
| Highway MPG | 27 | 96 |
| Combined MPG | 22 | 102 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2700 | $750 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 400.0 | — |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 5/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 5/10 | —/10 |
🚗 2013 Volvo C70
Subcompact Cars with 22 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volvo C70 Profile →🚗 2011 BMW Active E
Subcompact Cars with 102 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Electricity. Rear-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full BMW Active E Profile →🔗 Related