2011 Volvo S40 vs 2003 Ford Escort
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 25 MPG combined — Ford Escort is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $2400 — Ford Escort saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 Volvo S40 | 2003 Ford Escort |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2003 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Subcompact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S5) | Automatic 4-spd |
| Cylinders | 5 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 21 | 23 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 28 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 25 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $2400 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 355.48 |
🚗 2011 Volvo S40
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volvo S40 Profile →🚗 2003 Ford Escort
Subcompact Cars with 25 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Ford Escort Profile →🔗 Related