2011 Volvo S40 vs 2026 Mazda 3
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 24 MPG vs 30 MPG combined — Mazda 3 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2500 vs $2250 — Mazda 3 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2011 Volvo S40 | 2026 Mazda 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2011 | 2026 |
| Class | Compact Cars | Compact Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S5) | Automatic (S6) |
| Cylinders | 5 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| City MPG | 21 | 27 |
| Highway MPG | 30 | 36 |
| Combined MPG | 24 | 30 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2500 | $2250 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 370.2916666666667 | 294.0 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | —/10 | 6/10 |
🚗 2011 Volvo S40
Compact Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volvo S40 Profile →🚗 2026 Mazda 3
Compact Cars with 30 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Mazda 3 Profile →🔗 Related