2016 Volvo S80 vs 2012 Saab 9-5
📊 Key Differences
- Fuel economy: 29 MPG vs 24 MPG combined — Volvo S80 is more efficient
- Annual fuel cost: $2050 vs $2500 — Volvo S80 saves $ per year
- Fuel type: Regular Gasoline vs Regular Gasoline
| Specification | 2016 Volvo S80 | 2012 Saab 9-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Year | 2016 | 2012 |
| Class | Midsize Cars | Midsize Cars |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline | Regular Gasoline |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | Automatic (S8) | Manual 6-spd |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement (L) | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| City MPG | 25 | 20 |
| Highway MPG | 37 | 32 |
| Combined MPG | 29 | 24 |
| Annual Fuel Cost | $2050 | $2500 |
| CO₂ (g/mile) | 308.0 | 370.2916666666667 |
| EPA Fuel Economy Score | 7/10 | —/10 |
| EPA GHG Score | 7/10 | —/10 |
🚗 2016 Volvo S80
Midsize Cars with 29 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Volvo S80 Profile →🚗 2012 Saab 9-5
Midsize Cars with 24 MPG combined fuel economy. Runs on Regular Gasoline. Front-Wheel Drive drivetrain.
Full Saab 9-5 Profile →🔗 Related